TITLE
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

MODELLING VIOLENCE IN AMERICA
by
A very wise woman, Sissela Bok, at Princeton, made the case on PBS the other day that children had several models for violent behavior in our culture.
In this editorial, I would like to add a footnote to her presentation.
Among the sources for such modelling the behavior of young people are:
a. family violence. A great many children see violence, both verbal and physical, regularly in the home. While class and ethnicity weigh in when violence occurs, stress and unmanegable problems for parents, especially male parents also push adults into pre-theoretical violence toward children and women.
b. the media. Commercial media must sell audiences to business. Sex, violence, music and mystery all reach deep into the human psyche to entrance us. Entrancement by violence, in the same moment, helps circumvent rational appraisal of advertizments as well as providing depth modelling for violence.
c. sports. Football especially offers violence modelling. Professional Hockey may be even more violence but has a much smaller, much older audience.
d. the malls. Malls in America are filled with electronic games where for dimes, quarters and dollars, children may rehearse violence and may hone such skills as are useful to effective destruction of those defined, by the game, as enemy.
e. the State. The USA, in its role as policeman to the global economy makes recourse to violence and threat of violence where ever local problems threaten to obstruct the flow of goods, raw materials and profits to and from the Group of Seven [or Eight or Ten]. Politicians add their voice to the modelling process...children pay scant attenation to most until the actual bombing and shooting make the news.
f. private militias. In several states, various militia groups composed mostly of males marginalized by great structural changes in race, gender and occupational relationships. For such men, the State becomes class enemy in that it often sponsors new racial, new gender and new occupational relations.
g. organized crime. One must include organized crime as a source of modelling violence. Some estimate that organized crime contributes from 10 to 25% to gnp. And, given the great profits from hi-jacking, from drug trade, from pornography and from smuggling forbidden goods, violence often flares.
For most of human history; for most societies, violence was institution- alized. Young men were trained for violence and were used to do violent deeds. In modern high tech societies with commodity markets, violence is a problem more than a solution. Young men have ever fewer institution roles in which to be 'manly.'
For at least the last 4000 years of human history, in many, many societies, patriarchy gave social and moral power to men; they could without great moral onus batter and bruise women, children, serfs, slaves and others under their social umbrella. In modern high tech societies, women and men alike must compete to sell their labor power. In a putatively egalitarian society, children women become class enemy to men...as do 'foreign' workers.
The globalization of the economy has ravaged occupational and community relationships around the world. Pre-theoretic violence flares in most unpredictable ways; here one finds ethnic 'cleansing,' there one finds outbreaks of domestic violence, and elsewhere one finds underground groups bombing, assassinating and subverting the social order.
While many if not most people follow more appropriate paths in times of trouble, some do not. Many turn to religion for support, inspiration, guidence and solace; many try to improve their own lives with education, counselling and family aid. But some turn to violence, to drugs and to self destruction in the face of so much turmoil; so much sadness.
The solution is not, as we seem to assume in America, more prisons and more social control but rather more social justice aimed at providing redress to those great structural transformations which have so altered and have forever changed racial, gender and economic relationships.
TR Young, Editor FROM THE LEFT