THIS CHAPTER EXPLAINS HOW DRUGS, SEX, DANCE AND GAMBLING IS USED TO CREATE THE DRAMA OF THE HOLY...AND RULES GUIDING SUCH USE...ENJOY, TRYoung,

bahai.gif (267 bytes) buddhist.gif (867 bytes) christian.gif (246 bytes) HARE KRISHNa.GIF (320 bytes) hindu.gif (450 bytes) islam.gif (272 bytes) jainism.gif (3924 bytes) judaism.gif (357 bytes) NEO-PAGAN.GIF (242 bytes) shinto.gif (281 bytes) taoism.gif (298 bytes) unitaria.gif (536 bytes) wicca.gif (1049 bytes) confuci.gif (288 bytes)

fest.gif (1585 bytes)

THE DRAMA OF THE HOLY

celtic.gif (2262 bytes)

 

CHAPTER EIGHT


PATHWAYS TO THE HOLY:
Knowledge, Drugs, Dance, Drama, Divination
and the Realm of the Sacred


     But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace,
     patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness,
     self-control; against such there is no law.            
                                             Gal. 6:22

INTRODUCTION   Postmodern theology centers around an understanding
of the social nature of the Drama of the Holy.  In any era, a
goodly part of the poetic genius of human beings is dedicated to a
definition and realization of the god concept.  Each of the
thousands of cultures in human history have used differing pathways
to that task.  The point and purpose of this essay is to review and
to honor the pathways to knowledge invented and used to constitute
the drama of the Holy in societies around the world.  If we
appreciate the variety and the extent to which such activities have
contributed to the sanctification of nature and society, we may add
to our understanding of that which is needed to engage the Drama of
the Holy in these days.
     The structure of the argument made here is that each society
invents and protects some set of symbols, practices, artifacts, and
psychogens with which to achieve a state of bliss.  These sacred
supplies, used together, create extra-ordinary psychological states
in which one's genius and imagination are freed from everyday
worries and problems to ponder and to solve the larger problematics
of life that arise in ever-new concatenation.  The fact that
insight, vision, and solution emerge from such states of bliss is
interpreted, in premodern understanding, as proof presumptive that
one has engaged the realm of the Holy.  Postmodern understanding
honors that interpretation as entirely a cultural fact but, at the
same time, acknowledges that with such evidence and with such
interpretation, the realm of the sacred is realized.  
     That evidence is solid and that interpretation is appropriate
to the human process in both premodern and postmodern sensibility;
only in the modern scientific modality of understanding is it
discarded as myth, magic or make-believe.  However such pathways to
the Holy are neither strange, supernatural, magical or
metaphysical.  They are sanctifications, reifications and
vivifications processes nowise different in kind from all other
cultural products including the construction of kinship groupings,
the organization of political systems or the playing of a game. 
All are equally wonderful and all are equally human activities.
     The remarkable thing about the Drama of the Holy is that it
takes advantage of the capacity of human thought, human language,
human purpose and human activity to achieve non-linear dynamics. 
It is the degree of non-linearity and the cultural importance of
the solutions to life's exigencies that make the Drama of the Holy
central to all human societies.  Bushmen in South Africa,
Christians in Mexico, Hindus in Bombay and Muslims in Penang all
face the same problematics; all seek answers from the Holy spirit
of their tribe (here called its poetic genius in honor of William
Blake); all use sacred supplies and all find answers that, as the
preacher in Ecclesiastes put it, Maketh a man's face to shine.
     Use of sacred supplies and sacred artifacts and sacred
practices outside of the Drama of the Holy by nonpersons is usually
forbidden upon pain of death or exile.  Patriarchal societies
usually forbid women from entering sacred space, from touching holy
artifacts or performing sacred rituals.  All persons are forbidden
to use sacred supplies outside of the Drama of the Holy; the non-
social use of such supplies is treated as taboo and the offender
treated as unclean.  Sacred supplies used in other religious
traditions in the quest for spiritual enlightenment are defined as
unholy.  All of these efforts come together in the last part of
this essay to constitute a theory of corruption.  But the theory is
incidental to the larger purpose of the essay; to help build a
postmodern knowledge process that, once again, sanctifies nature
and society in a way that encourage a theology of infinite variety
and of surpassing beauty.
     I will begin by reviewing the missions of the knowledge
process in each of the three epochs that organize and inform the
analyses in this work.  The idea of a value-free knowledge process
is, in postmodern understanding, a nonsense notion.  The center
piece of the essay is a review of the use of sacred supplies that
take one out of the profane realm of everyday life and into the
sacred realm wherein one finds answers to spiritual questions. 
Finally, I will offer the elements of a special theory of
corruption that facilitates the larger Drama of the Holy in
postmodern theology.  I can help the reader anticipate the case I
make by saying that the sanctification of nature and society as
well as the realization of the god process requires a comprehensive
and enabling practice of social justice at all scales of human
being.  The knowledge process in all its various embodiments either
speak to or speak against the quest for social justice and thus to
the possibility of a Universal We.  
MISSIONS OF THE KNOWLEDGE PROCESS       As I have noted in other
essays in the series, the missions and methods of each of the three
epochs of human understanding are dramatically different. 
Premodern knowledge processes were and are oriented to the
definition, reification, vivification and deification of the god
concept in the pursuit of divine knowledge.  Modern scientific
knowledge process are pointed to the building of grand unified
theory which subsumes all of the dynamics of society and nature. 
Postmodern efforts at understanding attempt to locate the knowledge
processes of each epoch including its own self knowledge, in the
larger cultural and social context in which each are found.
     Briefly then, the missions of the knowledge processes in each
epoch are:
     Premodern:  Revelation of Divine Plan/Will of God; escape from
          this world of sorrow and danger; preparation for passage
          to the spirit world; achievement of Bliss; quest for
          divine intervention into natural and social processes.
     Modern:  Mastery of the present world; discovery of Universal
          Law; development of technology with which to control
          nature and society.  Perfection of each paradigm in each
          scientific discipline.
     Postmodern:  Location of the knowledge process in its social
          and economic context; examination (deconstruction) of
          subjective and intersubjective aspects of the reality
          process.  Calling forth of new paradigms to deal with new
          problematics in its more emancipatory modalities.
Premodern Missions  It is the missions and methods of premodern
knowledge processes with which we are most concerned here.  If we
drop down a level of generality, the premodern quest becomes a
search for answers to fundamental questions of existence.  These
questions include:
          A.   Where do we come from?  This is the identity
               question.
               The answer is usually couched in terms of a miracle
               or heroic feat that sets one people apart from and
               superior to all other peoples.  Such answers
               legitimate the social practices of a society to its
               members; enlist the loyalty of its young; justify
               predation of other societies; displace guilt and
               shame to its critics; inspire its warriors to
               courage and dedication and unite the future with
               the past.
          B.   How do we relate to other human beings?  This is
               the morality question.  Answers usually center
               around such spiritual values as:
               *Compassion         rather than envy
               *Caritas            rather than lust               
               *mercy              rather than legality
               *belief             rather than cynicism
               *faith              rather than nihilism
               *trust              rather than opportunism
               *hope               rather than despair
               *generosity         rather than avarice
               *acceptance         rather than exclusion
               *grace              rather than anger
          Answers to such questions smooth the rough edges off of
          interpersonal relationships; help constitute a
          particularized We; set the standards for allocation of
          scarce rewards and for application of sanctions; bond
          people together beyond words, beyond thought and beyond
          doubt.  This is the heart and soul of religion in all its
          manifold forms.
          C.  What will happen in the future?  This is the destiny
               question: it speaks to the common need for
               inspiration in a time of troubles.  It gives
               answers to questions heretofore unmet and
               unanswered in its norms, laws, institutions and
               cultural themes.  It helps a peoples decide how to
               enter the future:  Shall we, as a people, change or
               stay the same?
          Answers to this question usually suggest new ways of
          achieving ancient goals.  Creativity, surprise and
          innovation inform the knowledge process in this modality. 
          Fundamental transitions to entirely new ways are rare but
          do occur in response to prophecy.  Conversions,
          migrations, and chiliastic visions of a new age are,
          sometimes produced when inspired by bliss; sometimes
          adopted by a people in times of great troubles.
          D.   What do we do about the personal tragedies of life? 
               This is the existential question: What sustains us
               in times of trouble or need?  How do we carry on
               when we are tired, hurt, or profoundly depressed.
          Answers to this kind of question point one toward the
          liturgy of good work; have faith, labor in the service of
          God and all will come right.  Such answers provide a
          person with the inner strength to do that which is very
          difficult to do.  
          E.   How do we know what is good and what is right? 
               This is the ethical question.  When existing
               moralities and values clash, how does one
               prioritize and justify behavior.
          All peoples need generic rules for sorting out that which
          is right from that which is wrong.  Life is far too
          complex to rely entirely on the simple-minded compliance
          to existing mor‚s however sacred they are.  Rabbis,
          monks, Sufis, shaman, ayatollahs, priests, and preachers
          interpret and apply spiritual values to each historically
          located problem in terms of 'transcendent' ethical
          guidelines.
Reunifying the Knowledge Process   Modern science claims that
things of the spirit: faith, hope, generosity and compassion are
outside its purview.  Modern science from the time of Socrates
tended to argue that such questions were political and needed to be
settled apart from answers about impersonal laws of nature and
society.  Modern science, in its propensity for analysis, tends to
focus on the concrete and the present rather than the whole and the
possible.  Modern science, for its own self protection, needed to
distance itself from premodern understandings which disputed its
findings.
     Postmodern thought, on the other hand, views the knowledge
process in science and theology as shaped and pre-shaped, equally
and everywhere, by human interest and human desire.  Things of the
spirit do inform research questions in the larger political economy
of science.  Many of the spiritual elements of that political
economy do not fit well within religious traditions--warfare,
colonialism, racism, gender privilege, impersonal and unequal
market dynamics, massified public institutions as well as
privatized consumer impulses are equally spiritual but unbecoming
to the authentic self knowledge of a society.  Still these most
human needs have shaped the knowledge process before, during and
after the time of Newton.  
     By separating the knowledge process, falsely into the natural
sciences and the human sciences, bright men and women were able to
pursue their trade free of fear of inquisition and in the same
moment free of guilt, shame and onus even as the fruits of their
enquiry came back to privilege and empower those who partook of the
fruit of the tree of knowledge.  Today as in yesterday, those with
wealth and power have a decided advantage in setting the agenda for
scientific enquiry and a head start in using it.  All major
innovations mediated by class or national status tend to reinforce
that status.  Metallurgy, navigation, transport, communications,
electronics and space science all empowered some classes and
nations in their conflict with other classes and nations--even in
the face of loud and sincere claims of value-free science.
     One must praise modern science for the emancipatory knowledge
it does, in fact, produce.  There is much in the physical and
natural sciences which does speak to the spiritual values above. 
In agricultural sciences, in the medical sciences, in the
engineering sciences, there is much which benefits all classes,
races, and nations.  However modern science cannot be exculpated
from the knowledge it fails to produce which might speak to social
concerns any more than it can be exculpated from contributing to
the weapons of death and the tools of elitist control.
     More to the point for this essay, on their own terms,
postmodern science respects and receives the answers provided by
any and all pathways to emancipatory knowledge including those
oriented to the drama of the Holy.  Since these journeys to the
realm of the Holy are well within human capacity and experience,
there is no good reason to deny the answers they provide as we work
toward a theology that serves the human project in the 21st
century.  All three embodiments of the knowledge process can
complement and supplement each other; there is no natural conflict
between science and theology in their postmodern expressions.
METHODS IN THE KNOWLEDGE PROCESS        Each of the three
modalities of understanding in the history of the knowledge process
have differing methods by which to achieve its missions.  In the
discussion which follows, it might be helpful to keep the
etymological derivation of the concept of method in mind.  The
word, method, is a combination of the root words, meta, meaning
'from or after,' and hodas, meaning 'journey.'  The word, method,
is thus a journey to and from the source of knowledge.  In modern
science it is a journey to and from empiric experience toward sure
and certain knowledge.  In theology, it is a journey to and from
the spirit world toward sure and certain knowledge about questions
of the sort mentioned above.
     Premodern Its method of discovery is through Ecstacy.  In
               order to know the will of the gods, one must depart
               this world and enter into the spirit world.  Any
               act or aid which will alter the five senses and the
               psychological obstacles to knowledge are adjunct to
               the knowledge process.
     Modern    The method of knowledge in modern science is the
               method of successive approximations involving
               hypothesis, testing, and reformulation of theory. 
               In this journey toward knowledge, anything which
               sharpens and augments the five senses and helps
               clarify consciousness are adjunct to the knowledge
               process.
     Postmodern     The method of the postmodern is deconstruction;
		    i.e., to revisit the historical moment in which 
		    an idea, a theory or other social product was produced,
                    reconstruct the social economy of the time
                    and, using comparative research, document the
                    personal and social issues which gave honor,
                    respect and esteem to one such social product;
                    theory or one novel, over all others.
     Ancient pathways to knowledge include intuition, revelation,
divination by casting sticks, by interpreting cataclysmic events,
by reading cards, by listening to inner voices, or by reference to
holy texts.  Modern scientific pathways to knowledge include
quantification, statistical analysis of distribution, concentration
and variation from assumed normal distributions of social
practices.  The use of careful research designs by which causal
relationships can be identified, measured and retested help one on
the journey to Grand Unified Theory.  
     Postmodern pathways to knowledge presume active participation
in the reality/creative process by human beings.  Norms, roles,
statuses, institutions and whole social formations have no prior,
objective reality; in the speaking and acting come the facts of
social reality.  The logic of the postmodern, seeing the human hand
in every truth statement and in every test of human knowledge, in
the construction of all social realities, implies the need for
intersubjective methodologies.  Such methods are intersubjective on
a number of dimensions: in the first instance, human knowledge
helps create the universe it studies.  In the second instance,
human politics shape the knowledge process about that
intersubjectively created universe.  In the third place, all
knowledge requires intersubjective understanding; words, ideas,
theories, and social life worlds cannot exist separately in the
minds of human beings.  Knowing, speaking, thinking and
communicating is a collective, not an individual activity.
     Transferring the logic of the knowledge process in its
postmodern mode to postmodern theology, intersubjective methodology
requires a far reaching democratic theogeny in which a
particularized other transforms into a Universal We.  In that
effort, premodern methods of knowing are still important to the
human project.  While such methods produced knowledge systems which
were labelled primitive, pre-modern and viewed as superstition,
myth, magic or mysticism by modern science and while many
postmodern analysts tend to reject both modern and pre-modern ways
of understanding  still, in a multi-dimensional knowledge process,
itself congenial to the postmodern spirit, one would see premodern
methods as prior to but complementary of the scientific method
rather than primitive precursor or mystic competitor to it. 
     The very irrationality of premodern thought is most helpful to
the knowledge process.  With irrationality comes imagination,
creativity, possibility beyond the possible, discontinuity of
social causality, reversibility of social causality, transcendence
of social causality to entirely new dynamics.  This transcendent
rationality is recaptured in much of what is called New Age
religion.   With hope, faith, trust, belief and inspiration come
the ability to transcend that which seems fixed, eternal and
protected by an armory of control tactics and entrenched privilege. 
As Max Weber might have put it, faith in the charisma of the Holy
can undo nations and can overthrow despots.  Belief in the
transcendent goodness of the human condition can help fulfill the
very prophecy it proclaims as possible.  Trust in the possible
helps realize it in the actual lived experience of human beings. 
Nothing in these processes conflict with the insights and
sensibilities of the postmodern.  With imagination and
understanding of such dynamics, it is possible to build social life
worlds which do not exist in nature apart from the active and
continuing building.  One of the possibilities is a sanctification
process which constitutes the realm of the sacred.
THE REALM OF THE SACRED  Every human being has the potential to
live in three realms of activity.  For most of human history, most
people have for more or less of their lives so lived.  There is
first the ordinary physical world in which one must eat, defecate,
bath, sleep and generally attend to the demands of the physical
animal that all we are.  This is the profane world of nature:
biological needs and physiological functions are performed without
thought or prayer.  In this world of being, we go about our
business without creating shared symbolic worlds...without using
drama as a device to create the realm of the sacred.
     We are doing profane work when we clear the land or carve rock
from the quarry.  We are in the profane world when we tend crops or
when we herd animals.  It is a profane even if necessary thing we
do when we draw water or collect firewood.  The weaving of cloth
and the building of shelter is, even when in the service of others,
profane labor.  In the factories, shops and offices around the
world, making things, counting things, crating and shipping things
is profane work not directly connected to the quest for
enlightenment, redemption or salvation.
     The methods by which social realities are produced are, thus,
folk methods which come to us from the earliest times.  These same
methods in the same moment provide the most profound knowledge of
those social realities since the persons who construct them best,
know them best.  It is the heart of the postmodern theology here
that the keepers of such knowledge are the people who produce;
those of us who are merely social scientists may be honored by
being allowed to study and to report upon it but we are not given
a license by our various doctoral committees to deny or to transfer
such knowledges to differing paradigms of understanding.  If we are
to be true to the knowledge process, we must accept the dramas of
the Holy in both the definition and the interpretation of those who
so define and so interpret.  Postmodern social psychology returns
to the human hand that which they create; either in its most holy
forms or in its most profane forms.
Situated Dramas of the Holy   Dramas of the Holy are used to
constitute the ordinary social life world created by humans
themselves; roles, role-sets, situated social occasions,
institutions and whole social formations.  This world does not
exist, ontologically, in and of itself.  It is created through
social activity by believing, trusting, thinking, speaking, feeling
human beings.  It is a symbolic environment created by symbolic
interaction.  It is none the less real.  Such a world has the same
material facticity as do atoms, molecules, planets and
galaxies...as long as people interact to create themselves and
others as social agents and objects.  The reality quotient of such
fabricated realities is to be found in patterns of behavior;
patterns which are no more or less real than the patterned activity
which we call quanta, leptons, atoms, molecules, physiological
systems or biological entities.  All are equally patterned activity
of parts given meaning and form by the larger whole.
     A wide variety of sanctification processes located in various
Dramas of the Holy are used to create the second world and having
once created it, view it to be an ordinary part of nature.  There
are four generic uses of the Drama of the Holy in the construction
of social reality.  All four uses require nonlinear transformations
and are predicated upon definition, belief, hope, and faith.  The
first use; that of transformation, is called a rite of passage.  In
baptisms, a squealing, squalling, leaking blob of protoplasm is
converted into a son or a daughter in such a rite of passage.  In
weddings, a male is converted into a husband and a female into a
wife by virtue of such rites.  In other rites of passage, young men
are converted into first lieutenants; young women into doctors;
both genders into citizens in rites of passage.  After such
conversions, the individuals in question cease acting as nonpersons
and begin to act as social person...with more or less success.
     The second kind of holy drama involves the renewal of the
collective.  In festivals, parties, holy-days, dinners, feasts,
church services, or patriotic occasions, resources are combined to
produce a drama that is far removed from the ordinary, commonplace
social actions.  By assembling the elements of the Holy in one
place; at one time; with every eligible member present, a sort of
social magic occurs in which each person present is given to
understand that a superorganic entity exists; that the life of that
entity takes precedence over purely personal concerns and that each
one present is part of the superorganic entity.
     The third kind of holy endeavor involves faith healing;
preparation for war; ceremonies of survival after death, drought,
disease, or other natural calamity.  In this recourse to the Holy,
the entire collective...to its outermost is called to work together
to achieve that which is impossible for individuals to do each
pursuing their own separate concerns.  In the face of such
calamity, taken one at a time, we all are small.   Collectively, we
are greatly enlarged; more than the sum of the parts and might
survive.  The mystery and majesty of the Holy helps bind us
together in that brother/sisterhood with which the impossible
becomes manageable.
     A fourth kind of holy activity is a reversal of the rites of
passage.  The social power of the collective, vested in the person
of the holy woman or holy man, is used to dissolve the holy bonds
of marriage; the web of group affiliation; the integrity of family
membership.  It is used to desanctify agents entrusted with healing
or in judging who have used that sacred power for profane purpose;
including their own personal privatized gain.  In such ceremonies,
doctors are transformed back into mere persons; priests are
stripped of their office; wives and husbands are put aside to be as
strangers to each other.  Sons are disinherited and made unwelcome;
daughters are disowned and made to leave the safety of the
household.  
          These are the major social uses to which people put their
          remarkable capacity to create the realm of the Holy.
     Drama is thus used to mark off the realm of gods and miracles
from the world of mechanistic cause and effect.  In the realm of
the sacred, social magic runs its full force.  Healings,
ontological breaks, birth and death of social forms are made.  For
those who enter the realm of the sacred, and most do so easily
enough, miracles are possible.
     When we take on a social role; merge in a social group; act in
a social institution or function in a tribe, clan, nation or class,
we dwell in a social life world.  When we vote or play or send a
letter to a friend, we are creating and embodying social reality. 
When we hire a worker or found a business, we do so a part of the
second world of human experience.  The profane things we do in such
a world are kept in the background; are defined as not there in
social terms: belches, blinks, and other bodily functions are
treated as non-events from the point of view of social endeavor. 
The felling of trees, the building of dams, the laying of sewer
pipe may begin with a sacred ceremony to locate their meaning in a
larger social activity but, for the most part, they are prelude to
social practice.
     A social life world is sacred in so far as it binds us off
from the realm of nature on the one hand and connects us to others
in cooperative endeavor on the other.  It is closely connected to
the realm of the sacred, however the social life world in which we
live out our lives is created and renewed constantly without the
special drama of the Holy.
     Then there is the realm of the sacred in which ordinary,
everyday persons in their natural, biological aspect are
transformed into social actors: wives, sons, presidents or players
of sport.  In this world, drama is an essential tool with which to
reify and empower that which-once-was-not into that which-now-is. 
The components of the dramatic which create the Holy are varied
indeed.
Extensive Dramas of the Holy       The drama of the Holy varies
widely from society to society; differing pathways are taken with
which to reach the holy state.  The subject of the Holy varies as
well.  Sometimes the Holy is limited to a small group as when,
discussed above, during a baptism ritual it is comprised of the two
parents, the infant child, and the agent who speaks in the name of
all that is holy.  Sometimes the realm of the Holy reaches out to
encompass every member of the society; in which every member of
society plays a special role in generating the drama of the Holy. 
Sometimes the Holy is stretched to include all of nature and
extends deep into the dimensions of time.  At every scale and in
every niche of human endeavor, a drama of the Holy is possible.  It
is the larger, deep structures of society which are the most
problematic in a time of global connectedness.
     The task of postmodern theology is to find a way to organize
the many dramas of the Holy which work so effectively for face to
face encounters and for communal purpose to work for a more varied
and much more remote social process.  
          The origins, dimensions and social location of the Holy
          is an interesting story; perhaps the most interesting
          story that can be told within the scientific enterprize.
Social Magic   The short version of this story is that human beings
are able to construct the realm of the Holy with a form of magic
which I call social magic.  When the realm of the Holy is
constructed, it is every bit as real as is any other social
fact...it is this point which makes it possible for everyone and
anyone to be religious and to act on their religious impulse apart
from their views about the nature of God.  Even the most devout
atheist can accept without injury to integrity, a belief in the
Holy and can participate in the holy quest for peace and social
justice in company with those whose belief in God and the Holy
extends beyond the social component of that construction.
          If and when we create God; if and when we honor the Holy,
          these human constructs exist; they have the same
          ontological status as any other human artifact...they are
          real; as real as any other social fact: Detroit, the Dodgers,
	  Monday Night Football, CNN or the American Sociological
	  Association.  The same social processes are seen: Definition
	  of the Situation, Reification, Sanctification, Rites of Passage,
	  Degradation Routines, Disengagments, Hierarchy and Rebellion.
     I have offered a postmodern understanding of social magic in
a companion essay but, for the present, I want to say that, in
principle, there is no fundamental obstacle to the use of social
magic to sanctify all of nature and society--even a globalized
drama of the Holy is possible.  It is within the human grasp to
reinvent the god process in such a way that the many grand
narratives presently and separately fulfill the drama of the Holy
in local and parochial modalities, can join together to create a
Universal We which encompasses but does not obliterate each such
narrative.  The regions of phase-space are empty enough to
accommodate many more and many larger solitons than now dwell
there.
     Most people believe that one must be a theist in its premodern
expression in order to participate in the drama of the Holy. 
Postmodern missions and methods suggest that, in principle, one is
theist when one embarks upon the various pathways to the Holy
whether one consciously apprehends that fact or not.  In point of
fact, each of us, in every act in which we acknowledge another
human being are doing religious work; we are binding ourselves in
holy union to another when we listen carefully, when we speak
truthfully, when we respond helpfully and when we honor another's
need.  As the poet Blake said, mercy has a human hand and love, a
human face.  There is no love nor mercy unless some human being
somewhere loves and is merciful.  Such is the pathway to knowledge
about the Holy. 
PATHWAYS TO THE HOLY     There are many pathways to inspiration and
thus salvation in most theologies: faith earns one salvation and an
escape from the bitter imperfections of life.  Meditation, the
putting away of things of the flesh and things of the world, takes
one toward pure being.  Good works earn one merit in the eyes of
their god.  A pure and faultless life in which one walks humbly and
follows the way of the word brings hope of eternal life.  But it is
the active journey to a state of bliss which societies around the
world employ to seek enlightenment and to hear the word of God.
     A wide variety of psychogens are used to achieve bliss; to
take one out of the ordinary...out of the static and into the
extraordinary; into the ecstatic.  In this ecstatic moment, one
experiences and knows of the Holy.  Dance, drugs, song, chants,
alcoholic, sex, pain, isolation and risk can all help one achieve
those extraordinary body states that are prelude to realm of the
Holy.  
Sacred Supplies     Drugs, alcohol, violence, gambling and sex                  
create extraordinary states of mind and body.  These extraordinary
states are defined in a given culture as proof demonstrative of the
presence of the Holy.  Such definition is always a normal, natural
process...there is no magic to it at all; but it is magical in its
consequence.  As W. I. Thomas might have put it, Things defined as
holy become holy in the consequent.  
     Hashish and marijuana, beer, wine, peyote, mushrooms and
tobacco, opium, coca leaves are among several hundred substances
throughout the world are used in combination with other supplies
and practices to that end.  
     In Peru, coca leaves have been used for centuries as a pathway
to the divine.  Most of the time the leaves are chewed whole as a
mild anesthetic.  Once or twice a year, the coca leaves are
roasted, mixed with ash and used to create a sense of the Holy. 
Only during the religious ceremony do men use large doses of coca
leaves.  The intense pleasure derived from taking the mixture is
interpreted as union with the gods.  The ceremony is made in order
to improve harvests, to gain forgiveness or to know the will of the
gods.
     Sometimes dance, chanting, danger, gaming or violence is used
to generate an ecstatic state.  Sometimes extraordinary amounts of
food, specially prepared food, very rare or very expensive foods
are used to create the realm of the sacred.  In Roman celebrations
of a solidarity, people gorged themselves with food...and then
disgorged themselves in order to continue.
     Among Columbian Indians, cigars are smoked by brujos and
brujas to call forth healing spirits or to exorcise evil spirits. 
American Indian males used tobacco in male councils to help make
connection with the Holy in making decisions to move, to fight, to
plant or to deal with new and strange situations.  Smoking a pipe
with an intermediary by a disputant was an important system for the
resolution of disputes and the restoration of social peace among
Indian tribes of North America.
     Pain is used as a psychogen among the Flagellants of New
Mexico, the Blackfoot Indians and many others.  The Hispanic men
who flagellated themselves at Easter are said to be sanctified. 
Those who endured the pain of Blackfoot initiation rites were said
to be men...after they tore themselves loose from a thong inserted
under the chest muscles.
     Danger is used as a psychogen in many places.  In New Guinea,
males dive headfirst from platforms with ropes tied to their
ankles.  The point is to gauge the dive so one's head barely
touches the ground.  The adrenalin serves as a psychogen for all
those assembled and helped create the fact of the Holy.
     Among American Indians, young men were sent to fast and to
inhale fumes of various plants in order to discover their special
connection to name and be thus be named.  If one saw a bear or an
eagle in such a euphoric state, one took the name of that animal.
     Among the Mayan, a form of basketball was used to create
solidarity.  The captain of the winning team was beheaded as a way
to mark his achievement.  Spectators were euphoric.
     The Ainu in Northern Japan sacrifice a bear and eat the body
parts in order to become part of the bear spirit...and to thank the
spirit of the bear clan for its contribution to the group.  Many
societies extend the idea of the Holy to all of nature.  Christians
label this idea primitive.
     In Algeria, the male solidarity is called the isawa.  Muslims
do not use alcohol as a sacred supply.  It is created by solemn
prayer.  The reading of the first chapter of the Koran and the
chanting of prayer alters body chemistry.  This altered state is
interpreted as proof demonstrative of the presence of the Holy
Spirit.
     In contemporary North America, young males engage in
controlled violence in many sports activities daily, weekly or in
season, accompanied by music, song, dancing maidens, alcohol and
the use of many sacred words.  Such an activity is then defined as
a 'good time.'  The participants are then defined as 'good
friends.'  This may seem excessive but given all the sources of
conflict: jobs, ethnic, gender, age and class conflicts...strong
doses of religion may be necessary.
     The usage of the psychogens above are, for the most part,
oriented to a quest for particular knowledge; knowledge of the Will
of God, knowledge of the future, knowledge of the sources of
travail, knowledge of the solutions to emergent problems.  The
psychogens are used as well to gain the favor of the gods; to
solicit intervention, to placate anger, to forestall the natural
consequences of flood, quake or drought, to counter the anger of
other gods.  Such usage of psychogens produce solve the problems of
solidarity between persons and groups who would otherwise be in a
conflict relationship as they compete for scarce supplies of food,
shelter, game, grazing land, water and other profane supplies.  M
SEX AND THE HOLY    Sex is a favorite and effective sacred supply. 
Everywhere there is the use of sex to bind people together in holy
wedlock.   The sacred nature of human sexuality can be seen in the
restrictions and the demands made on the sexuality of couples.  It
can be seen in the license given to young people in many places to
act on their sexuality freely until a social union has been made. 
It can be seen in the suspension of sexual restrictions during holy
days.
     *Communities in Germany, Tibet, Polynesia, and South America
     change the rules of sexual access to include all adults during
     a variety of sacred ceremonies.
     *In Mardi Gras, a combination of psychogens is used to create
     the realm of the sacred.  Sexual license, alcohol, dancing and
     music all converge to create communal solidarity in a holy
     ceremony.
     *In New Guinea, young men are initiated into manhood by a
     complex ritual which includes a first sexual experience and
     cannibalism of one couple by the rest of the initiates.   
Sacred Prostitutes  The argument that prostitution is the oldest
profession...and thus, cannot be repressed is based upon a
superficial understanding of the use of sex in the temple to
achieve the Holy.  The religious use of the sexuality of young,
prepartum females is for divine purpose.  She is respected and for
a time, part of the unity of the sacred.  The use of female
sexuality as commodity is superimposed by modern capitalist
understandings of market and profit rather than the traditional
understandings of sex in societies around the world as a pathway to
the gods.
     In tantric hinduism, the tantric must worship the goddess of
bliss daily.  In so doing so, the male unites with the Holy via the
person of the female.  The female does take gifts, does provide
sexual services and is not, can not, be considered part of a social
pair.  Neither is she a prostitute who sells sexual favors to
anonymous others as a market commodity.
     In such tantric Hinduism, the male worshipper makes an
offering of five such sacred supplies:  meat, fish, mudra (parched
grain), alcohol and sexual intercourse.  He draws a mandala of
circles, triangles and squares using vermilion paste, salutes the
diagram as symbolic of Sakti, the cosmic source, and chants
mantras.  He toasts the goddess of bliss with the alcohol.  He
uses the various foods to purify and counteract the effects of the
alcohol.  Drinking alcohol without the foods is considered sinful
and pointless.  Tantrics who have not yet reached a high level of
spiritual competence are not allowed to get drunk.
     The foods and alcohol are offered to a young and healthy woman
who takes the place of Sakti in sexual union.  The woman is present
in physical and in symbolic terms but is not there as a whole
person with social status.  Ritual drinking with the woman is a
vital part of the ceremony but the point of the ceremony is to
bring the male and the male alone into communion with the gods.  In
this case, solitary drinking is approved as a pathway to the gods.
     There is a political economy behind both the religious and the
commodity use of female sexuality.  In agricultural societies with
male inheritance, surplus girls were given or sold to the temple. 
In capitalist societies with a population surplus to the capitalist
class, young women and young men alike prostitute themselves to the
alienated sexuality of those who view sex as a market commodity. 
The meaning of such prostitution is far different in each social
formation as is the meaning of pornography.
PORNOGRAPHY    The word pornography means, literally, the writing 
               (graphos) of prostitutes (pornos).  Pornography is
part of the ancient ceremonies of solidarity in which males of an
age group or an occupational group visit a temple to create
themselves as part of the realm of the sacred.  Food, alcohol,
song, stories, and sex are used in combination to obliterate
hostilities, animosities, conflicts and troubles between males.
     From England to Germany to Persia and Burma, pornography is
used as erotic supplement to other solidarity supplies.  The temple
prostitutes in Rome and Greece are well known to modern scholars. 
The sculptures on the temples at Khajuraho in Northern India are
visited by thousands of tourists each year.  The ruins of Pompei
include erotic art.  Erotic art is found in Mayan, Incan and Aztec
culture.
     Erotic art... as a solidarity supply...is used in Japan and
China to establish the pair bond.  Newly married couples are given
'pillow books' to teach them how to give each other pleasure.
GAMES OF CHANCE AND THE HOLY       Many societies use chance as a
pathway to knowledge.  The thought is that since it is the Will of
God which determines everything, one can discover the Will of God
through the fall of a bone, stone, stick or card.  Senior men or
women, entrusted with the task of determining the will of the gods
with regard to the fate of a person during illness or tragedy--or
the fate of an entire society during a time of famine, flood or
drought, have cast stones, studied entrails, dropped sticks, read
tea leavings or turned cards throughout recorded history in the
effort to learn the will of the gods.
     Gaming is probably an outgrowth of the use of bones and stones
for divination.  The Gesar epic is known in Tibet, China, Turkey,
and Mongolia.  It is over a thousand years old.  One of its main
themes is Mo, or divination with dice, prayer beads, or sacred rope
knots.  It is still practiced among exiled Tibetan monks.
     In the Korean game of Yut, four sticks are thrown to determine
the fortune of individuals and families.  Yut was played on the
last and first day of the lunar year.  It is now played year round. 
The Chinese play several card and bone games for bet which
developed out of the quest for sure and certain knowledge about how
events would turn out.  
     In Gotland and in Scotland, the caber is tossed for prize. 
Park is a game in which teams of seven take territory from each
other. Varpa, or playing stones, came from the throwing of
limestone rocks at invaders.  
     As with most such castings, readings, and turnings, chance
played a great part.  However things fell, a person of some
sensitivity; a person with insight into the wisdom of the tribe; a
person of great creative genius would look at the pattern in which
the sticks or bones or tea leaves fell and interpret their meaning
in terms of that great wisdom.  The nature of language and the
fractal character of truth itself allows much leeway in the
judgment of such interpretations.  Much as present day readings of
the horoscope are broad enough and open enough to encompass the
sources of evil of everyone; much as they are focussed enough and
wise enough to give advice which, if followed, is beneficent, the
interpretation of entrails, of bone patterns, of tea leaf
scatterings suffice in the healing and in the explaining of a hurt.
     At the same time, there are so many escape clauses available
to shaman, curanderos, witch-doctors, healers, sorcerers and
fortune tellers that, even if diagnosis fails and therapeutic
regimes disappoint, still the structure of divination and
soothsaying can be sustained; if a person is wise enough and
trusted enough, s/he will have enough success to warrant further
trust.
     The transition of such into games of chance as a solution to
personal problems an easy and natural one.  Males, usually males,
would cast bones or stones or sticks to determine who was favored
of God.  When a gambler is lucky, there is the feeling that one is
in perfect connection with the forces of nature...one feels that
one can't lose.  In the case of dice, the numbering of each side
and the setting of rules gave visible and immediate proof of the
favor of the gods...especially if there were wagers on the throw of
the dice.
     Today, the workings of the lottery or of some other game of
pure random draw are often interpreted by the lucky winner as a
favor of god.  Pecuniary theology interprets the good fortune of
those who give money to a ministry as a reward from God for such
gift.  Many in teleministry use such beliefs to reap considerable
return on the chance blessings of their god.
Divination through Cards      Playing cards began as a way of
knowledge about the Will of God.  The use of Tarot cards for
divination of the future began in the 13th century.  Tarot cards
embodied pictographs of legends and myths going back thousands of
years.  The cards derived from the book of Thoth, an ancient
Egyptian god and embodied the mystic knowledge of time and of the
cycle of seasons.  In Greek mythology, Thoth was given the name
Hermes, from which hermeneutical knowledge derived.  Hermes was the
messenger of the Gods who brought a knowledge of the future as
ordained by the gods down to those mortals who were qualified to
know the gods.
     Sjoo and Mor, in their work on matriarchy (1987), argues that
mystical ways to knowledge were defined as evil or superstition and
male gods began to replace the female gods.  The male world,
dominated by logic thought and concerns with control, repressed the
feminine ways of knowledge by canon law and later, by common law
and then by statutory law.  Feminine ways of knowing were said to
be unnatural and therefore the work of the devil.  Women who used
these ways were labelled witches and burned at the stake.
     This way of knowledge competes with other ways of knowledge of
the future plans of God.  Many religions teach that the future is
known only to God and that only religious functionaries can conduct
the drama of the Holy.  For people to turn to other sources for
such knowledge presumes disbelief in the gods at least...and
pretensions of godlike capacity at worse.  Priestly functionaries
repressed such knowledge systems as an offense to their God.
     Along with palmistry, astrology, phrenology and alchemy,
playing cards became defined as evil, corrupt, sinful and blasphemy
in many Christian societies.  People who used them challenged the
gods, as did Prometheus, and must be punished.  Part of the Drama
of the Holy is, thus, the Drama of Taboo, sin and corruption.
Patriarchy and Access to the Gods  Most societies permit the use of
economic risk in gambling occasions within senior male religious
solidarities.  One may wonder why male solidarities require these
special privileges.  The short answer seems to be that under most
conditions in which males find themselves, men have to compete with
other males for scarce resources.  The larger answer has to do with
the origins of patriarchy and male privilege.
     Origins are difficult questions and controversial in the
extreme.  Many believe that there are biological and physiological
reasons for patriarchy.  Many believe that there are in fact,
remote gods whose plan for human beings privilege males.  Some
believe that society must have a division of labor in which men do
one set of tasks and women another.  A minority believe that there
are economic reasons why males are privileged; beliefs having to do
with, first reward for conquest and second, transfer of property
through unambiguous male lineage.  
     The sexuality of women is used to solve such problems.  Young
men are permitted to rape women in the course of predatory raids
while the booty goes back to be shared out among a kinship group. 
First born sons inherit in order to keep the land intact and avoid
the subdivision of property below the level needed to support a
family.  Women are secluded by norms in order to validate such
lineage claims--and forestall competing claims for power and
property since, were a woman sexually accessible to outside men,
her children could be claimed by them; and assigned property rights
as well.  Virginity, fidelity, chastity and seclusion fall upon
women rather than men for quite practical reasons in societies
whose political economy is precarious.  In those areas where the
political economy is adequate to the needs of a family or tribe,
sexual norms are much less restrictive and patriarchy much less
practiced.
     In patriarchal societies, male heads of family group must
compete with other similarly situated males for land, game, water,
women, status, wealth and followers.  Competition and the tension
it brings argues for special attention to the generation and
preservation of solidarity among males.  In societies without such
competition or without such scarcity, there is less structural
reason for special gambling rights for males--and one might add,
less reason for patriarchy.  
     Patriarchy, whether in feudalism, slavery, capitalism and
bureaucratic socialism require that the knowledge process and its
use for control and command be male-centered.  Senior males in such
societies claim a monopoly over religion in order to use the Will
of God to legitimate such power relations.  If anyone is to use
cards, sticks, guts, stones or bones to know the will of God, it
was to be males...dominate males.
     Gambling by women, children, slaves, workers, and foreigners
were and are defined as corrupt and repressed by law and custom in
many lands.  Gambling for non-religious, therefore nonsocial
reasons was, and is, defined as sinful.  Gambling for personal
pleasure...e.g., standing alone for hours in front of a slot
machine carried no social, hence religious meaning therefore was
repressed as immoral and illegal.  It certainly was immoral in the
sense that such gambling violated the mores of a patriarchy when
women or children attempt it.
     Gambling, drinking, sports events, and night life in general
was repressed as wage labor emerged.  Capitalists wanted their
workers to be fresh and ready at the break of day to work.  Staying
out late to gamble or play was defined as immoral and the power of
the state was used to suppress play and gaming by the working
class.  The wastage of wages on drink or gambling was, likewise,
repressed since owners would have to pay higher wages to permit it.
     In American society, males often get together for small-stake
poker games, for football pools, for racing events, and for a wide
variety of other shared risky activities.  The limited risk of
friendly bets on poker or sports outcome all create ecstatic body
states which are interpreted by the participants as "good times." 
The stakes are usually well within the means of the players and the
rules are often changed to keep people 'in the game."  
          Under these circumstances, gaming is a solidarity device
          and supportive of cherished social relationships.  
POSTMODERN UNDERSTANDINGS OF SIN AND CORRUPTION        Premodern
understandings of sin and corruption center around the belief in
another world and the necessity of making connection with it.  The
task of making connection is seen to be difficult; the consequences
of not making contact are seen to be monumental.  Everywhere,
pathways to the sacred are guarded; the Drama of the Holy is
protected and the supplies essential to the achievement of bliss
are reserved for and only for the drama of the Holy.
     Privatized use of the symbols, supplies, activities used in
the Drama of the Holy as well as privatized use of knowledge
obtained from inspiration, meditation or revelation are defined as
sinful, corrupt, evil, profane or the work of the Devil in many
societies.  Terrible penalties are exacted for the profanation of
elements in the Drama of the Holy.
     Words used to invoke the Holy are not to be used lightly in
the realm of the profane or in ordinary social interaction. 
Clothing used to signal the gods or define the Sabbath is not to be
worn during non-religious endeavor.  Supplies used to achieve bliss
are never to be used for purely private purpose.  Holy men and
women are to be protected and cherished in ways above and beyond
that accorded ordinary persons or nonpersons.  The use of rituals
for private gain or against members of a religious community is
defined as blasphemy, witchcraft or corruption.
     Everywhere there are rules, sanctions, warnings and taboos
which protect the Drama of the Holy.  The section below offers a
special, historically variable theory of corruption.  Such an
explanation focuses upon specific acts which transgress and blur
the lines between the realm of the Holy and the other two realms of
action.  I reserve the term, 'desanctification' to refer to the
more impersonal and historically framed process by which all three
frames are stripped of their sacred content.
THE RULES OF SACRED SUPPLIES       All societies develop and use
                                   different combinations of
psychogenic substances, sacred words and enabling activities to
create extraordinary physiological and psychological states.  When
these body states are achieved, they are interpreted within the
structure of meaning in a society as proof demonstrative that one
has entered the realm of the sacred.  Since the gods are powerful,
one must be very careful how and when one approaches them.  Since
the whole tribe or kin grouping is thought to be at risk of the
anger of the gods, trivial or inappropriate solicitation of the
gods is a serious matter.
     In a postmodern understanding of corruption, the drama of the
Holy confers moral power upon those who are defined as members of
the sacred order.  They have the right to invoke the name of their
god in injunction of even the mighty among them.  The use of sacred
supplies work to make holy those rites of passage which transform
a nonperson into a person in the sight of their gods, i.e., in the
sight of others defined as persons, generally.  Such rites of
passage bestow social power upon those so blessed.  Given social
power, one can expect and receive the material goods and the
services by which they can reproduce the cultural forms in that
society.  Social power causes others to listen, to hear, and to
respond in ways compatible with the spoken word when such words are
in the service of social norms.
     Thus the drama of the Holy depends, in many societies, upon
the ways in which sacred supplies are produced and distributed.  A
whole set of rules have developed to govern the use of sacred
supplies and thus to regulate the place, the time and the geometry
of the Universal We.  Postmodern theology, if it is to help support
a polycentric drama of the Holy in the emerging world order will
have to revise the rules governing access to the use of sacred
supplies.  The rules themselves are fairly clear: societies
regulate the use of some supplies and activities to ensure the
efficacy of the Drama of the Holy.  
Access and the SuperOrganic   The use of sacred supplies is usually
limited to those assemblies in which solidarity relations exist or
are in the process of being expanded or redefined.  As a Durkheim
would point out, it is in the assemblage of the whole society in
which the power and the mystery of the gods is most easily
experienced.  
     It is in the presence of the entire society assembled that the
Holy is most directly felt.  Durkheim (1961) put it this way:
     '...[that] which is the universal and eternal objective cause
     of these sensations sui generis out of which religious
     experience is made, is society.'
     And,
     'If religion has given birth to all that is essential in
     society, it is because the idea of society is the soul of
     religion.'
     and,
     '...we have seen if collective life awakens religious thought
     on reaching a certain degree of intensity, it is because it
     brings about a state of effervescence which changes the
     conditions of psychic activity.  Vital energies are excited,
     passions more active, sensations stronger; there are even some
     which are produced only at this moment.'
     Single persons are permitted to and even required to seek out
and to appeal to the gods under some conditions but it is always on
behalf of the welfare of the entire society--or that portion of
society which is defined as having full standing as a human.  The
use of words, beverages, songs, costumes, make-up, or other
accouterment of the sacred ceremony at nonsocial times or for
nonsocial purposes is strictly forbidden.
          Psychogens are used within and only within the boundaries
          of 'society-assembled' in special sacred occasions.
     The first rule of religion is, then, that the Holy is created
only when society as a whole is assembled...meaning those occasions
when the Drama of the Holy is enacted by members of the social
order.  Persons permitted to use sacred supplies and participate in
the Drama of the Holy in such situated dramas are not permitted to
participate, to observe or to use the sacred supply before or after
the Drama of the Holy upon pain of death.
     The use of sex, tobacco, alcohol, or other sacred supply is
thus forbidden at times when the drama of the Holy is not enacted. 
The rule means that only people who are actively engaged in
cherished social relations may use the sacred supply in everyday
life.  Those who are not may not.  Married adults may engage in
sexual relations but unmarried children may not in those societies
which use human sexuality as a way to celebrate the holy state of
wedlock.
Profanation and Privatization of the Sacred       The private use
of any sacred supply is condemned as a profanation of the Holy. 
Societies have pejorative terms to use upon discovery of the
private, nonsocial use of sacred supplies.  Alcoholism, drug
addiction, gluttony, madness, compulsive, mania, perversion and
other derisive terms are used when persons are found to be using
alcohol, drugs, sex or other psychogens for personal reason.  The
use of sacred symbols outside of the Drama of the Holy is called
profanity.
     When such supplies are used in the service of the Drama of the
Holy, use is permitted even demanded.  It is not the amount of
alcohol consumed that makes one an alcoholic or the frequency of
sexual activity which makes one a pervert; it is the private use of
sexuality outside of the celebration of society and the norms which
define it.  When one uses violence on behalf of a society, it is
defined as an honorable and courageous thing to do.  The same
physical courage in the violation of social norms is less than
honorable.
     Invoking the power of the gods for private use in a secret
ceremony is called witchcraft.  Appeal to gods foreign to a society
is called Devil worship.  Baal was worshipped by the Moabites but
was deemed Satan by the leaders of the Israelites.  Today, those
who worship other gods are called pagans, savages, or idolaters. 
Social sanctions are deployed to punish those who are tempted by
the devil, healing rituals are used to cast out devils, prisons are
built to hold and to mortify the flesh of those in whom the devil
has taken residence and asylums are established to deal with the
madness and badness attributed to those who profane sacred supplies
and activities.
     In both modern and postmodern analysis, there are no devils as
such; the devils that are, are the collective representations of
other societies in their norms, folkways, and mor‚s as well as
their pathways to the holy.
Exceptions     There are some exceptions granted for the solitary
(not private) use sacred supplies.  Some societies require a young
man to go into the mountains and enter into communion with the
spirit world in order to receive a name and a destiny.  In these
societies the solitary use of psychogenic substances is permitted. 
When a women is about to enter into a sacred role, she is permitted
to partake of the sacred potions alone.  
     When a woman is engaged in the healing of a member of the
tribe, she may use holy words and holy things.  When a holy man is
to prepare himself to receive the advice of his gods on behalf of
the community, he alone is permitted to use sacred supplies.  While
the person is alone in physical terms, s/he remains embedded and
loyal to the social organization of the society in its totality.
Unholy Supplies     A third rule is that the sacred supplies used
by other peoples are forbidden since they make invoke other gods or
dilute the efficacy of approved supplies.  If a culture approves of
alcohol, it may define the use of marijuana or coca leaves as
corrupt.  If a society meditates, it may define dancing as corrupt. 
If a society uses food, it may define song or chant as the devil's
work.  Whatever set of psychogens a society uses, it protects them
by declaring competing psychogens as sinful.
     The same rule applies to other elements of the drama of the
Holy.  Clothing, body decoration, words and rites from other
societies are seen to be accouterments of devil worship,
witchcraft, or blasphemy.
     Pathways to sacred knowledge and sacred status are thus
protected by a complicated and interlaced set of norms which enable
members of a society to embody the drama of the Holy on the one
side and to defend against profanation on the other hand.  The
rules of exclusion thus define when the use of a sacred supply is
corrupt and when it is required.  The familiarity of gender-
structured restrictions on the use of sacred supplies warrants a
brief section in order to make a theory of corruption more visible
and immediate.
Nonpersons and Access to the Holy       Another rule for postmodern
understandings of corruption is that only members of a solidarity
may use sacred supplies.  Members have access to other necessities
of life as a matter of status regardless of merit, money, or
physical power.  It is important in those societies to prevent the
'wrong' persons, i.e., nonpersons; strangers, outsiders, low status
or degraded persons are prevented from the partaking of sacred
supplies in order to control access to moral power.  Those who
haven't prepared themselves properly, who have offended the gods,
those who are unclean by virtue of their status or those who
worship other gods are excluded and exiled from the Drama of the
Holy.
     In patriarchal societies, the use of sacred supplies is
restricted to those times and places when adult males are seeking
access to the Holy--or the times when young men are being
transformed into adults through sacred rites.  In such societies,
women and children are forbidden to participate; often forbidden to
watch or to draw near.  In terms of the analysis made here, only
those who are part of a generalized and significant other are
permitted the blessing of the gods.
     This rule also prescribes that only pre-qualified members are
to be transformed into social persons by the use of sacred
supplies.  One must be connected to the religious community in some
known and accepted manner else one is not fit to be made a member
of a solidarity and thus have the right to participate in the drama
of the Holy.  Lineages are usually defined following some rule of
descent as a precondition for sanctification.  Sometimes a people
will permit adoption; sometimes a form of temporary adoption is
used.  Whatever the case if a child were born outside of a
sanctioned relationship or from two persons for whom such a
'social' relationship were impossible in local terms, that child
was defined as a bastard, as illegitimate, or took the caste of the
mother.  Such children could not be accorded roles in the drama of
the Holy.
     When any person is prequalified to membership in a sacred rite
of passage,  they are accorded, by virtue of that drama, the social
power to request and to get the necessities of social life.  This
rule gives control over the gateways to social space to the society
assembled.
               In sexist societies and in slave societies, women
               and slaves are excluded for partaking of the Holy.
     When age-grade are used as pre-tests for access to the holy,
young people may not use sacred supplies; may not smoke, drink,
make love, or use certain words.  When class or caste grading is
used, those in the lower echelons of the class are thought to be
presumptuous or pretentious in their aspirations to the drama of
the Holy.  When racial categories are invented and enforced,
persons from other 'races' are denied access to the drama of the
Holy.  These conventions often extend to all uses of social power
and social access; schooling, voting, speaking, or working.
     In order to protect the Drama of the Holy from persons defined
as unclean or unqualified huts, caves, tents, meadows, clearings or
other sites are defined as sacred and reserved for qualified
persons.  Unclean persons are forbidden to wear the scars, badges,
or dress of such drama.  They are forbidden to touch the
instruments of the drama; weapons, tools or musical instruments. 
In order to protect the ritual activities, communicants with the
gods are sworn to secrecy.
Male Solidarities        We can see the way in which corruption as
a social control tactic arises in patriarchal societies.  In these
societies, the sexuality of women are subordinated to population
control, property transfer and/or predatory economics.  In such
societies, male solidarities use alcohol and other psychogens.  
     In societies with real (or socially imposed) shortages of
essential goods or services, solidarity problems arise.  When males
are taught to compete for and to dominate in the acquisition and
distribution of basic goods, solidarity becomes a special problem. 
Strong measures are taken to guarantee solidarity in the midst of
so much conflict.  Young men are taught to drink together to
excess, to use violence in groups, and to share the sexuality of
women in order to create a sense of brotherhood.
     In societies with such alienated gender relations, males claim
a monopoly over the use of all such sacred supplies including
weapons, musical instruments, sports equipment, gaming equipment
and other holy artifacts.  In some societies, women can be beaten
and raped for simply touching such sacred supplies.
     Male solidarities use a combination of such supplies to create
the extraordinary physical and psychological states which are,
then, defined as evidence that the group or individual has entered
the realm of the sacred.  One can see some of the thousand
different ways the ancestors of Americans used and still use sacred
supplies to bond males together in solidarity...and thus transcend
the special interests of any given male for scarce resources.
CONCLUSION     If we understand that great effort is given over to
create the sense and the fact of the Holy in order to bind people
into a society; to bind them into social roles; to bind the
partners of a social status-set together for all time, then we can
begin to appreciate the social nature of religion...and the sacred
nature of some practices and social goods.  This is, in both
premodern and postmodern theology, a sanctification process.
     These goods and services, defined as sacred and reserved to
effect the drama of the Holy, contribute to the generation of
sacred knowledge.  In the use of alcohol or other psychogens, a
state of intense awareness is possible.  In such states, one puts
away everyday concerns and seeks guidance to questions the nature
of which affects the fate of the society or some cherished portion
of it.  The quest for an insight and a wisdom, oriented to the
health and well being of the entire society sanctifies both the
society and the knowledge process.
     One can see from the etymological origins of the words;
sacred, drama, work and holy, that the use of sacred supplies in
the drama of the Holy is a holy use.  Deep in the prehistory of
the human race there came a time when it was recognized that the
essential work of human beings was to create the Holy; to make it
possible for human beings to live whole with themselves; with
others; and with the natural realm upon which all things depend.  
     It is a healthy thing to create the Holy; anyone with a human
face and human heart can do so.  To do so, one dramatizes; one sets
aside the profane labor of physical survival and enters into the
Holy work of forging a compact with others which we call
religion...from the Latin, religio, I bind, I bind back.
     One must, therefore, be very careful about definition in law
and in theology which control the use of sacred supplies.  There
are some sacred supplies most harmful to the body and being of
those who use them in whatever dosage.  Some harm the liver; some
harm the lungs; some harm the genetic structure of newborn babes. 
Some are additive and thus by pass the self system as mediator of
behavior; thus reduce the efficacy of social control tactics.  Some
practices degrade others in order to uplift the few; pornography
and temple prostitution may contribute to male solidarity but do
little more than demean women and men who so prostitute themselves.
     Yet the pathway to the Holy is an essential part of the Drama
of the Holy.  Song, food, chant, music, sexual joy and gaming can
be organized in ways that do not carry with it a price which, in
the end, desanctifies and demeans.  In postmodern theology, such
degradation is truly and actually, the death of God.
     Postmodern theology accepts and honors these pathways to the
Holy since they provide for the kind of knowledge that modern
science cannot or will not.  Inspiration, revelation, and wisdom
are hard to come by.  Even scientists benefit from such subliminal
cerebral activity.  The operative question for any method of
knowing is not so much the truth value of its product but rather
the use value in terms of a conditioned transcendent which binds us
together in the near future while it heals the ancient wounds of
class and class, of race and gender, of poverty and privilege.
Postmodern Understandings of God   I want to make two points about
and the Drama of the Holy          God and perfection that emerge
from a postmodern understanding of the Drama of the Holy.  I want
to use these the analyses and explanations above to help build a
postmodern theology which serves the human condition without the
exclusivity and meanness of spirit that are found in some premodern
understandings of the god concept.  I will come back again and
again to these points in companion essays:
     1.   Neither salvation nor perfection are the goal of post
          modern religion...but rather praxis.  Postmodern gods are
          not, in the first instance, all knowing or all powerful. 
          In the first instance, they try to expand mercy, justice,
          and joyful life by means of situated and extended drama
          of the Holy.
     2.   The reach and role of praxis must extend to all of nature
          and society in a global political economy.  Exploitation
          and privilege are inimical to the drama of the Holy.
     3.   God may exist in bodily form if and only if human beings
          embody the teachings of their God.  That God cannot and
          does not exist as pure spirit apart from the belief, the
          faith, and the practice of the religion of that God. 
          That which binds extends the god concept; that which
          divides and demeans, destroys it.
     4.   Most of the teachings of the god concept in any one of
          the many grand narratives are congenial to the human
          project; some are not.  Sanctification of a family or a
          society by means of the desanctification of other
          families or societies is an unholy drama which engineers,
          in postmodern theology, the death of god.
     5.   Wisdom and caution must be used in the critique and
          transformation of any given grand narrative.  Some kind
          of statement about universal human rights matched with
          universal human obligations are helpful to such critique.
     6.   Each grand narrative claiming to embody the god process
          must be subject to a postmodern knowledge process which
          enlightens and illuminates the dramas of the Holy at
          every scale of social organization.  Premodern pathways
          joined to and complementary of modern scientific methods
          of knowing are necessary.  
     This is such a radical view of God that one might want to go
other essays in this volume in order to more fully understand the
context in which it might make sense to speak of an imperfect and
partial God existing only in the flesh.  It is possible to believe
and to have faith in such a god concept and to participate joyously
and innocently in such a Drama of the Holy.  From a distinctly
postmodern perspective which sees the human hand in every cultural
product from art, history, science or theology, it may be the only
way it makes sense to engage in God-talk.
     The idea that God is a human process and a human artifact is
an old idea.  But the assertion that comes along with the modern
idea that humans make God in their own image, is an assertion that
God doesn't really exist...He is simply a product of a more
innocent time...an anthropomorphic fiction.  The sure and certain
answer to this in postmodern understanding is that sometimes God is
a fiction but sometimes, God really exists.  In this reading of the
god concept, the reality quotient of the god process depends upon
social justice practices since, in empowering and enabling people,
one sanctifies them.  And since all social forms require a material
base, sanctification of all of nature is part of the postmodern
understanding of the god process.  The dimensions and qualities of
the god process are sensitively dependent upon the way we do
justice.
     St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas are given credit for the
premodern understanding of God as an Active Watching Principle. 
Schliermacher and Hegel are given credit for disembodying Him and
making him pure and rational spirit and, in the same moment, little
more than a matterless abstraction of universal laws of matter and
society.  A more accommodating postmodern viewpoint sees the god
concept as a human product with the same facticity and efficacy as
any other such product; an army, a corporation, a social role or a
social identity.  All these emerge as real in the act of defining
and interpreting and most of all, embodying them as real.  One
cannot exclude the God concept from the reach of empiric science
since it has the capacity to motivate, to organize, to transcend
and to sanctify ordinary physical realities into something very
special.
     It is the healing power of the spiritual dimension of the Holy
that sustains and brings us from the depths in a time of troubles. 
It is the compassion, the mercy, the support we get from others and
give to others which draws us, inescapably toward the realm of the
Holy when we hurt or sense the existential hurt of others.  We do
respond to the touch and to the voice of another person who tells
us with love that it matters that we live; that we survive this
latest tragedy which befalls us.  In so doing, we benefit from the
drama of the Holy.
     Religion is much to important to the human project to leave to
dogmatic fundamentalists or to hardcore atheists.  The realm of the
Holy; things of the spirit; distinctly human values are central to
the human project whatever one's understanding of God and the
supernatural.  As spiritual values become awkward to the needs and
purpose of the rich or the powerful, religion in its human/humane
form gets distorted or put aside or used for quite irreligious
purpose...more to manage and to distance the rich and the powerful
from those they hurt rather than to bind us all together in a
common journey of life.  When this happens, God dies a slow and
painful death.  The death of God is the subject of the next essay. 
It is a consequence of a vast desanctification process that has
expanded with the coming of modern science.
     Let us now consider the death of god in postmodern theology.

celtic.gif (2262 bytes)