Syllabus
Revised 16 October

SOCIOLOGY 3700
Section One: T H, 11:00 - 12:15
Section Two: T H, 09:35 - 10:50

Classroom Building, 209 

David Ashley
Ross Hall, 417
Office Hours: T H: 2:30 - 4:00, and by appointment

ashleywy@uwyo.edu

Prerequisite for this Class:  SOC 1000 (Sociological Principles)


If you have a physical, learning, or psychological disability that requires accommodations, please let me know as soon as possible.  You will need to register with, and provide documentation of your disability to, University Disability Support Services (UDSS) in SEO, Room 330 Knight Hall, 766-6189, TTY: 766-3073

History of Social Theory

This class examines the development of social theory from the period of the U.S. and French revolutions to the Great War of 1914-1918 and the worldwide depression of the 1930s.  We shall study so-called modern or "classical social theory" against the backdrop of the development of modernity in Western Europe and North America. This class will thus contain some European and U.S. social and economic history, some social philosophy, some economics and some political theory.

Few students in this class are sociology majors, so I bear this in mind as I teach the course.  The following are some of the broader questions we shall address this semester:

bulletWhat are "modernity," "modernism" and "modernization?"
bulletWhat is postmodernity? Are we leaving the modern era behind?
bulletIs there such a thing as "social progress?"
bulletWhat will happen when the preëminence of the west comes to an end?
bulletWhat made the west "preëminent" anyway?
bulletIs classical sociological theory still relevant today? (And what is "classical" sociological theory?)
bulletHas the long-standing debate about the role of the state versus the role of markets been settled?
bulletHow can such theory help contemporary subjects locate themselves in time and social space?
bulletIs America (the USA) a long-term, viable, or, even, a coherent social project?
bulletCan classical theory help explain current trajectories of change?
bulletCan it shed light on some of the dilemmas facing contemporary subjects?

This may seem an odd admission for a "theorist" to make, but I have never been very interested in "theory," per se.  I am interested in society, social change, social problems, historical events and trends.  "Theory" is a tool that helps us make sense of such things.  If it doesn't help explain anything it's pointless, as far as I am concerned.

Unfortunately, you are not going to see the point of social theory unless you already have thought a little bit about your immediate (and past) social environment.  For instance, if you have never heard of the Enlightenment, the French revolution, the Great War, the New Deal, or that kind of thing, you probably will be at a bit of a loss in this class.

Required Text: David Ashley and David M. Orenstein.
Sociological Theory: Classical Statements, 6th ed.  Allyn and Bacon, 2005


Required Additional Reading

Note:  All these readings can be accessed from this page from the (underlined) links provided below.

 1.  Discussion of (a) Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), (b) John Locke (1632-1704) and (c) Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)

 2.  U.S. Declaration of Independence

 3.  Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). Social Contract: Book 1

 4.  Emile Durkheim on (a) solidarity, (b) the division of labor, and (c) anomie.

 5.  Emile Durkheim on (a) crime, (b) suicide, and (c) religion

 6.  Georg Hegel's Theory of the Modern State (Avinieri)

 7.  Karl Marx. The Communist Manifesto (Read Sections I and II only)

 8.  Karl Marx. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. Estranged Labor

 9.  Karl Marx. The German Ideology. Idealism and Materialism (Extract)

10.  Read Frank Elwell's "The Sociology of Max Weber"

11.  Max Weber.  From "The Protestant Ethic" (The Uniqueness of the West)

12.  Georg Simmel.  The Metropolis and Modern Life

13.  Arthur Schopenhauer  (Listen to Christopher Janaway)

14.  Sigmund Freud. Civilization and its Discontents (extract)

15.  Psychoanalysis and Sigmund Freud (discussion)

16.  Friedrich Nietzsche.  Genealogy of Morals (extract)

 

Materials and notes from class will be placed as links in the boxes below

Immanuel Kant (notes)

Man With A Plan.  Herbert Spencer's Theory of Everything

Why We Feel So Poor

Circuit of Capital

Marx's Model of Exploitation

Multiculturalism is a Disaster

The Prince (Machiavelli)


Expectations:

1.  Two short discussion papers required

(25 percent of grade each). Deadlines: 16 October and 06 December 

Each paper should be approx. 2,000-2,500 words long, excluding references and bibliography, and should be written tightly. Topics for discussion and more detailed instructions will be given out in class. You can give me early drafts for feedback and critique by 5:00 p.m. up to five days before the deadlines for these papers.

A check-list for discussion papers can be found  below.  Use it.

Note that the links at the end of this syllabus direct you to numerous primary and secondary sources that be used in preparing these papers.  Please consult these first before you ask for additional sources.

Do not plagiarize from the Web.  This is easy to spot and creates significant problems for both of us.

If you need help with the mechanics of writing use the University Writing Center.  Make sure you cite all sources in your papers.  Also, make sure that I can easily identify the PAGE you are citing from (as well as the author, title, book, periodical, or whatever).  If you use the Internet, just cite the Web Page.  You will be downgraded if you do not cite appropriately.

You will receive a letter grade for your discussion paper.

Here are some questions for the discussion-papers.  If you don't like these topics, substitute one of your own.  It should address some issue or question having to do with the subject matter of this class.  If you choose your own topic check it with me before you write your paper.  Please note that discussion-papers require you to do additional reading.
  1. Comte, Spencer and Marx all used stage-like theories of historical change to describe social change.  What (if any) are the similarities and differences?  Are there any salvageable aspects of their schema that are still useful?  Why/Why not?

  2. Durkheim was described in class as the one theorist we study who was "purely sociological" in theory and method.  To what extent is this true?  What are the advantages and disadvantages of Durkheim's approach?

  3. Critique Durkheim's theory of suicide.  What are the methodological limitations and problems?  Has the theory stood the test of time?

  4. Critique Durkheim's theory of religion.  Is there anything wrong with it?  What doesn't it explain that it should explain?

  5. To what extent was Marx a romantic, rather than a critical theorist or social scientist.  (Hint: start with his early work and his analysis of alienation.  Also, you might want to consider if Marx conclusively shows that ALL forms of alienation are linked to capitalism, per se).

  6. What is living and what is dead in Marxist theory.  In other words, in the year 2007 what in Marxist theory should be discarded and what is still useful?

  7. Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had a broadly similar view of the state.  What is that view?  What are its theoretical strengths and weaknesses?

  8. Against Marx, and, to some extent, against Weber, Simmel argued that impersonality, indifference and calculability in modern life could be liberating.  How can this be?  How does Simmel use sociology to help explain the typical modern (urban, blasé individual).

  9. What, according to the anti-Enlightenment theorists, is WRONG with Enlightenment social philosophy?

  10. How does the University of Wyoming help foster “bad conscience” and ressentiment (Nietzsche)?  What does this have to do with power?

  11. Can Nietzsche save us from nihilism?  (Define "nihilism" carefully).

  12. According to Adam Curtis (Century of the Self), modern elites were increasingly distrustful of ordinary people (the mass), fearing modern individuals were destructive, rootless and irrational.  At the same time, modern individuals typically have regarded themselves as relatively self-reflective, free and rational.  How can we resolve this apparent contradiction?

  13. According to Eric Hoffer, (Passionate State of Mind), "the search for happiness is one of the chief sources of unhappiness."  What light might Durkheim, Weber, Freud and Nietzsche shed on the meaning of this aphorism?

  14. Write a paper attempting to reconcile the thesis Weber develops in "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" with Marx's materialist view of history.

  15. Why did Weber believe that modern Western rationalization was irreversible?  Was he right?

  16. Why are intellectuals so hopelessly idealist (or hopelessly addicted to the doctrine of philosophical idealism)?  Explain, with reference to Marx.  [Have to read The German Ideology]

  17. Watch the Frontline documentary "Merchants of Cool" at the link below.  Write a review of this documentary from a Marxist perspective.
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cool/

  18. Why did "elite theorists" (Mosca, Pareto) believe that rule by elites was necessary?  What major contribution did Pareto make to political sociology?

  19. Write a critique of Freud's view of religion [Have to read "Future of an Illusion"]

  20. Write a book review of Freud's "Civilization and its Discontents."

PAPERS ARE DUE DECEMBER 06

Please note that I will not accept discussion papers after December 13.  This does not mean that the REAL deadline for the second discussion paper is December 13.  It means that I will not accept any written assignment after that date.  Late papers will be penalized.


2.  Eight multiple-choice quizzes
(worth five percent each).  These quizzes are designed to check whether or not you have done the assigned reading.  If you do not study the assignments expect to fail this class.  The quizzes are intended to be easy.

Quizzes are graded as follows:

15 = A+
12-14 = A
11 = B+
10 = B
9 = C+
8 = D+
7 = D
0-6 = F
 

3.  Participation and attendance (10 percent of grade).  Minimally, "participation" means asking questions.  I think everyone can do this.  At best, it means shaping the class through discussion.  Not everyone can do this.

After the first day of class, I take attendance.  If you are absent and do not have a written university excuse you will be recorded as absent.  If you miss more than seven classes you will receive an automatic "F" grade.  If you miss 5-7 classes, you will be downgraded by one letter.  If you miss 3-4 classes it will almost certainly hurt your grade.

In short, in order to have an excused absence you must:

(1) Obtain a written slip from the Office of Student Life or the Athletic Office, or get a doctor's excuse.
(2) Give me a copy.
(3) Do all this within 30 days of the date you missed class.

There are no make-ups for quizzes.  If you miss a quiz because of an official university excuse your other scores will be averaged.

Discussion papers handed in late will be penalized.

I expect each student to visit me at least once during the term to discuss papers, ask specific questions, make criticisms and suggestions for this class, etc.  Please stop by as soon as possible if you are having problems, or experiencing difficulties and anxieties.  Also, feel free to use E-mail to make appointments or ask questions. I check my E-mail two or three times a day and, usually, I will get right back to you.

Make sure you keep up with the readings and do not miss the deadlines for the response papers and the discussion papers.  Note the importance of participation and discussion in this class. Discussion helps people work through their ideas. It is not a waste of time. The best way to learn is not just to listen and copy what I say but to engage in an active process of argumentation that enables you to test your ideas and preconceptions by forcing you to justify them.

There is no "political correctness" in this class.  I hate all kinds of "political correctness."  Don't be surprised if you are challenged or offended by some of the ideas to which you will be exposed.  If you don't like that kind of thing you might be happier elsewhere.

I probably shouldn't have to say this, but I am not interested in converting you to a particular political, moral or normative point of view.  This class examines different (and conflicting) ideas, all of which, in various ways, have been enormously influential.  We take the ideas seriously; ourselves less so.

So, remember:  except in the most tangential sense, SOC 3700 is not about you and it is not about me.  It's about something else.  

 

SCHEDULE

Dates Read by the Beginning
of the Week
Assignments/Quizzes Due
Week #1 28/30 August A&O: Chapters 1, 2 (Read by Thursday)
Week #2 04/06 September Readings 1, 2, 3 Quiz #1 on 09/06
Week #3 11/13 September A&O: Chapters 3, 4
Video Extract : The Romantics
 
Week #4 18/20 September Readings 4, 5  Quiz #2 on 09/18
Week #5 25/27 September A&O: Chapters 5, 6
Reading 6
Quiz #3 on 09/25
Week #6 02/04 October A&O: Chapter 7

The War on Democracy
(video extract)

 
Week #7 09/11 October

Readings 7,8, 9

Quiz #4 on 10/11

Week #8

16/18 October Adam  Curtis: The Power of Nightmares (video)

A&O Chapter 8

FIRST PAPER DUE 10/16
Week #9 23/25 October Readings 10, 11 Quiz #5 on 10/23
Week #10 30 October/01 November A&O Chapters 9, 12
Reading 12
Quiz #6 on 10/30
Week #11 06/08 November Adam Curtis: The Century of the Self (video)  
Week #12 13/15 November A&O: Chapter 10
Readings 14, 15
Quiz #7 on 11/13
Week #13 20 November (No class Thursday) A&O: Chapter 11  
Week #14 27/29 November A&O: Chapter 14
Human all Too Human (video)
Quiz #8 on 11/27
Week #15 04/06 December Reading 16 SECOND PAPER DUE 12/06

THERE IS NO MIDTERM AND THERE IS NO FINAL EXAM FOR THIS CLASS

Here is some information about some of the videos we shall see in this class:

The Romantics (Part One)

The War on Democracy (John Pilger)

The Power of Nightmares (Part One)

The Protestant Reformation

The Century of the Self (Parts One and Two)

Check list for discussion-paper:

Have I adopted one of the topics given out by the instructor? 
If not, have I clearly explained what my paper is trying to accomplish?

Does my paper have a concluding section?  Does it have a middle and a beginning?

Have I cited ALL sources appropriately (see above for link to Writing Center).

Have I organized my paper in paragraphs?  Do I write in complete sentences?

Have I written tightly?  Have I ruthlessly eliminated ALL  superfluous words and sentences?

Do I use standard English?  Are my spelling and punctuation correct?

Have I proof-read what I have written very carefully?

Did I go back and proof-read my paper a second time?

Have I read enough to write a decent paper?

Have I made an effort to collect and report relevant information and data?

 

Theory Links

The following links direct you to primary sources and to secondary discussions.
Use them selectively to help write your discussion papers
.

Timeline of Sociology with numerous links to primary sources:-

bullethttp://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/timeline.html

A discussion of the works of Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Hume,
the Enlightenment, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Mead:-

bullethttp://www.philosophypages.com/hy/

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, with links to all the social theorists:-

bullethttp://plato.stanford.edu/

The Internet Encyclopedia of philosophy.  (Good short biographies)

bullethttp://www.iep.utm.edu/

John Locke's writings:-

bullethttp://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Fperson=131&Itemid=28

Useful discussion about Durkheim:-

bullethttp://www.src.uchicago.edu/ssr1/PRELIMS/Theory/durkheim.html

Also about Durkheim:-

bullethttp://www.bolender.com/Sociological%20Theory/Durkheim,%20Emile/durkheim,_emile.htm

Durkheim's "Home page":-

bullethttp://www.faculty.rsu.edu/~felwell/Theorists/Durkheim/index.htm

Herbert Spencer:-

bullethttp://www.victorianweb.org/philosophy/spencer/spencer.html

Hegel links:-

bullethttp://www.hegel.org/links.html

Marx/Engels Library:-

bullethttp://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/

and:-

bullethttp://eserver.org/marx/

Max Weber's "home page":-

bullethttp://www.faculty.rsu.edu/~felwell/Theorists/Weber/Whome.htm

Discussion of Simmel:-

bullethttp://socio.ch/sim/work.htm

A Veblen site:-

bullethttp://www.mnc.net/norway/veblen.html

The Freud File:-

bullethttp://www.freudfile.org/

Freud.  Internet Resources:-

bullethttp://users.rcn.com/brill/freudarc.html

The Nietzsche Channel

bullethttp://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/

Guide to sociological resources on the internet:-

bullethttp://www.socioweb.com/~markbl/socioweb/

Sociology Mega-Sites:

bullethttp://www.abacon.com/sociology/soclinks/mega.html

 

 

Students and Teachers Working Together
(University Document)

 

The following document, which describes both your and my duties and responsibilities in this class, is required reading

Before you ask me a question, please check to see if the answer is below.

“Civility is not a sign of weakness.” John F. Kennedy

At a good university, good student/teacher relationships come from mutual respect, trust, and honesty. Learning takes place when teachers and students treat each other with politeness and civility, rather than with anger, ridicule, or confrontation. Indeed, a classroom conducive to teaching and learning is the right of all University of Wyoming students and faculty, and it is the responsibility of both parties to achieve and maintain it even though specifics will vary from course to course. This document, Students and Teachers Working Together, provides some guidelines for carrying out that responsibility.

A teacher (that is, anyone who teaches) should do his or her best to provide a disciplined yet comfortable and supportive classroom environment. Teachers’ materials should be well organized, their procedures clear and fair. They should encourage questions and questioning, although students should remember that insight often comes from struggling with a problem rather than being given the answer.

The ultimate responsibility for learning lies with the individual student.  Although faculty members will teach and guide and university staff will assist and encourage, learning is the responsibility of the student.  Learning is hard work, and full-time students should consider “studenting” to be a full-time job.

 

 Course Syllabus

University Regulations (Unireg 29, http://uwadmnweb.uwyo.edu/legal/Uniregs/ur029.htm) require that a teacher provides a syllabus for each class taught.  A syllabus is a contract between the student and the teacher that makes clear the expectations and requirements the parties are expected to fulfill.

 

Students

 

Teachers

 

1.       It is the students’ responsibility to understand the syllabus.

2.       Students should keep their course syllabus handy so that they can refer to it on matters of course policy.

3.       Students are responsible to find out any changes made to the syllabus during the semester.

1.       At the beginning of the semester the teacher should provide students a syllabus.

2.       A syllabus is a written record of the course’s requirements and should include the teacher’s office hours, contact information, grading, attendance, and academic dishonesty policies as well as the course’s purpose, scope, content, expectations, schedule, assignments, readings, and other policies outlined in this document.

3.       Teachers have the right to modify the syllabus, but all revisions should be clearly announced in class.

 

   Attendance

 

Students

 

Teachers

 

1.       Students should attend all required meetings of their courses.

2.       UW-authorized absences for UW-sponsored      activities are accepted, and the teacher will re-schedule the missed homework and exams without penalty. Refer to the University regulation at http://uwadmnweb.uwyo.edu/legal/Uniregs/ur713.htm

3.       Teachers identify what constitutes an excused    absence beyond the UW-authorized absences. Leaving early for vacations or breaks does not constitute a valid reason for absence.

4.       If a student must be absent from a class or cannot complete assigned work on time, the student should consult beforehand with the teacher if at all possible.

5.       The student should not expect the teacher to re-teach the class because of the student’s absence. It is the student's responsibility to obtain notes from a fellow classmate.

6.       Students should come to the class prepared.

7.       Students should be familiar with the dates of scheduled exams and other assignment deadlines.

 

1.       Teachers should set an attendance policy for their classes that should be announced to students and included in the course syllabi.

2.       UW-authorized absences for UW-sponsored     activities are accepted, and the teacher will re-schedule the missed homework and exams without   penalty. Refer to the University regulation at http://uwadmnweb.uwyo.edu/legal/Uniregs/ur713.htm

3.       Teachers should identify what constitutes an   excused absence beyond the UW-authorized absence. [I will accept no other type of  "excuse."  You must provide me with a written excuse
Leaving early for vacations or breaks does not constitute a valid reason for absence.
Refer to the University regulation at
http://uwadmnweb.uwyo.edu/legal/Uniregs/ur713.htm

 

4.       If canceling a class, the teacher should inform students well beforehand or, if unforeseen, a message should be posted in the classroom.

 

 

 

 

  Classroom Deportment

 

Students

 

Teachers

 

1.       Students should bring to the classroom thoughtful and relevant comments for discussion in appropriate classes.

2.       Students should come to the class prepared having completed the reading or other assignments.

3.       Students should keep the content of their discussions relevant and be tolerant of and open to exploring differing points of view.

4.       Unsanctioned talking, use of cell phones, eating, sleeping, and reading unrelated materials during classes are rude and disruptive behaviors.

5.       Abusive language and behavior are unacceptable and do not encourage a useful learning environment.

1.       Teachers set the tone in the classroom to encourage discussion and questions where appropriate.

2.       Teachers should answer questions in a respectful and courteous manner.

3.       Teachers should encourage an inclusive environment where all people can engage in the discussion process.

4.       Abusive language and behavior are unacceptable and do not encourage a useful learning environment.

 

 

 Phone and E-Mail

 

Students

 

Teachers

 

1.       Students can expect from the teachers clear phone and e-mail protocol to be followed, including:

·         whether or not the teachers accept calls at home.

·         weekend or evening phone policies.

·         whether they return calls to students.

·         whether or not e-mail is the preferred method of communication.

·         time frame students can expect an email or phone response.

·         policies regarding leaving messages in the

                departmental office.

2.       Students should use their UW email accounts or forward their private accounts to the UW system.

3.       Students should not use e-mail or phones to request grade information from their teachers.

1.       Teachers should be clear about phone and e-mail protocol and indicate the preferred method.  [I prefer you use E-mail]

2.       Teachers should respect the students' need for a variety of methods of contact (other than stopping by during office hours or before/after class) that will get a response in a timely manner, for example:

·       message boards outside office.

·       leaving messages in the departmental office

·       notes in faculty mailboxes.

3.       Teachers are not required to solicit non-UW email accounts.

4.       E-mail and phone may not be used to transmit grades to students (there are a few exceptions to this; contact the FERPA officer in the Office of the Registrar for details).

 

 

Office Hours

Teachers are required to hold three office hours per week. These should be on two different days.

 

Students

 

Teachers

 

  1. If not specified, students should inquire as to any specific office hour policies.

  2. Students can expect to meet with their teachers during the teachers’ office hours or make arrangements for alternate appointments if there is a conflict with the posted hours.

  3. The student should notify the teacher in advance to cancel or re-schedule an appointment.

  4. Stopping by during the posted times does not necessarily guarantee the availability of a teacher (e.g., there may be numerous students waiting).

  1. Teachers should have clearly posted office hours.

  2. Teachers should announce their office hour policies.

  3. Teachers should make clear their preferences for scheduling appointments if students have conflicts with the posted times.

  4. If they are unable to keep their office hours at any time, teachers should announce this in class, if possible.

  5. Last minute cancellations should be posted on the teacher's door, and the departmental office associate notified.

 

   Grading and Assessment

It is the teacher’s prerogative to set policies regarding grading and assessment.  Each teacher may have different policies.

It is important to be clear and consistent in grading policies and standards.

 

Students

 

Teachers

 

  1. Students can expect a clear description of the teacher's methods of grading and assessment and a prompt return of their graded assignments.

  2. Students should be aware that there is no automatic right to make up missed assignments; students should inquire as to the specific policies of each teacher.

  3. If concerns over grading arise, students should respectfully discuss the situation with their teachers.

  1. Teachers should be clear about their methods of grading the assignments as well as their criteria for overall course grades.

  2. Teachers have a responsibility to grade and return assignments within a reasonable time.

  3. Teachers should be clear about their policies regarding accepting late work.  [Late work will be penalized.]

  4. Teachers should grade equitably, so that comparable work receives comparable grades.

  5. Teachers should be prepared to give appropriate feedback on assignments.

  6. Teachers should be open to student concerns over grading.

 

 Academic Honesty

Academic honesty is expected, and dishonesty will not be tolerated and can lead to expulsion from the College and the University.  The University Regulation, 802 rev 2, at http://www.uwyo.edu/legal/Uniregs/ur802.htm discusses academic dishonesty in detail. The College of Arts and Sciences procedure guidelines are at http://www.uwyo.edu/a&s/Appeals_Dishonesty/Guidelines_Dishonesty. Students and teachers are strongly advised to read these regulations.

 

Students

 

Teachers

 

  1. It is expected that the academic work the students perform for their courses will be their own work

  2. If students are unsure of acceptable practices, such as how to handle cooperative work with other students, they should inquire of the teacher.

  3. If the policy regarding educational aids is not specified, students should assume that no aids are permitted on exams.

  4. Students should neither receive nor give unauthorized assistance on any assignment, exam, paper, or project.

  5. All quotes and ideas from other sources should be properly attributed.

  1. Teachers should make clear their policies on matters of:

·         documentation.  [All sources must be cited.]

·         cooperative work with other students. [Study groups are permitted.]

·         educational aids such as calculators and note sheets.

  1. Teachers are expected to report suspected violations of academic dishonesty policies to the appropriate authority.